brain2-roundtable
Your notes. Four perspectives.

Turn your notes into a plan you can act on

brain2-roundtable brings four distinct roles to your question: proposer, analogist, skeptic, and pragmatist. Follow the reasoning, see what gets challenged, and leave with an action card linked to your own notes.

ProposeConnectChallengeAct
Notes → Action

Before / After

01 / MAKE THE PLAN CLEARER
BEFORE

Original plan: Reply to work messages only at lunch and before finishing work. The rule does not yet distinguish routine updates from confirmations that keep colleagues moving.

Concept illustration of messages waiting between two daily check-ins

Original reply plan · Concept illustration

AFTER ↗

After the roundtable: Check ordinary messages after work blocks. Give urgent requests a separate route and ask senders to state what is blocked and when they need a reply.

Roundtable transcript↗
Roundtable transcript
Open full-size image ↗

This is a more explicit proposal to try, not a measured reduction in interruptions.

From source material to a practical next step

02 / CAPABILITIES
4 distinct rolesPropose, connect, challenge, act
2 source groupsPreserve each group and its sources
1 action cardIncludes a next action and risks

Each example below uses two groups of notes, one round with four individual statements, and a single action card.

Connect ideas across fields

Borrow an idea from another group of notes while making the analogy and its limits clear.

Challenge a plan’s assumptions

Put a specific objection on the board so later contributions can address it.

Keep the original sources

Link cards to claims and fragments, with source quotations copied directly by the script.

Make the next step concrete

Bring the discussion into a specific idea, a reason to try it, a next action, and risks.

How it works

03 / HOW IT WORKS
01

Bring a question and your notes

Choose a specific question and group your notes by topic.

02

Organize the sources

Keep source references and fragment IDs, then assign material to each role.

03

Run the discussion in order

Each role works independently. Statements enter the board only after passing the rule checks.

04

Create an action card

Connect the idea to existing claims and sources from different groups. Address the strongest challenge in the risks.

05

Save the reasoning

Export the card and full transcript to revisit how the proposal changed.

Everyday questions.
A different perspective.

Cross-field thinking

A desk reset inspired by game storage

How can I tidy my desk in five minutes before finishing work?

Kitchen and Games notes lead to a reset designed for the next work session. The objection is practical: deciding where items belong could use up the five minutes.

The resulting card starts with items that already have homes and one small section. That scope is a trial; temporarily grouping other items can simply move the clutter.

Full discussion↗
Full discussion
Original discussion screenshot · Open full-size ↗
Pressure-test a plan

A reply plan that accounts for other people

How should I modify a plan to reply only at lunch and before finishing work?

An urgent route sounds useful, but it can become another stream of interruptions. The discussion adds an explicit request format: what is blocked and when a reply is needed.

The card proposes a three-workday trial of work-block checks and clearer urgent requests. Eligibility and response expectations still need agreement; fewer interruptions are not yet established.

Full discussion↗
Full discussion
Original discussion screenshot · Open full-size ↗
A small first step

A reading action small enough to begin

What small daily reading action would be easy to start, even when I am busy?

Habits and Exercise notes suggest a small reading action without catch-up debt. The challenge is the cue: a book beside a seat does little on days when that seat goes unused.

The card asks you to choose an existing routine and keep the book where it happens. One sentence is a trial parameter; notice whether the routine occurs, the book is seen, and reading starts.

Full discussion↗
Full discussion
Original discussion screenshot · Open full-size ↗

Keep the reasoning within reach

04 / TRACEABLE REASONING

Rules govern the discussion

Scripts check role order, assigned sources, and claim references. A statement becomes an official claim only after acceptance.

Sources stay attached

Cards retain fragment IDs and source references. The transcript shows which claims were refined or challenged.

Risks remain visible

Each card addresses objections and treats trial parameters as proposals. You still need to assess whether the action works in your setting.

Who it is for

For people who have notes and a concrete plan to improve: professionals balancing focus with collaboration, people refining everyday routines, and learners looking for a manageable way to start reading.

BRING YOUR NOTES

Start with a question and two groups of notes

Download brain2-roundtable from Finch and give the installation package or extracted folder to your AI assistant to install. Bring a question and two groups of notes to begin a roundtable.

Download from Finch ↗

A prompt to begin

Use brain2-roundtable to discuss my question using these two groups of notes. Run one round and produce one action card with a next step, risks, and verbatim source quotations.